|
|
Post by aaron_commissioner on Feb 24, 2018 17:09:29 GMT -8
Simple question, if both teams are in the red, should they be allowed to make a trade with each other, even if the cash remains even? Currently, balanced trades are always allowed. This would force teams to manage their finances and trade with "green" teams to clear salary.
|
|
|
|
Post by brewerstom on Feb 25, 2018 5:05:51 GMT -8
yes, because posing restrictions on trading partners i cant agree with.
|
|
|
|
Post by CardsGM_Sean on Feb 26, 2018 6:17:13 GMT -8
Strong no from me on this one.
Teams shouldn't be allowed to continue to add while operating over the budget. What's the point of a budget if you can just it whenever you want?
|
|
|
|
Post by JF_Expos on Feb 26, 2018 10:35:13 GMT -8
do we mean in the red for the BUDGET or the CASH?
|
|
|
|
Post by samtigers on Feb 26, 2018 11:14:44 GMT -8
I voter “allow”, as long as teams in the red are able to structure a deal that is totally even via cash or ML players. I feel otherwise it may dramatically reduce value for players and lead to the rich getting richer by allowing a team not in the red to offer less for a player that a team in the Red is looking to sell; when another team in the red may be able to offer more creative deals involving retention/additional players - again as long as the amount ends up even both sides.
|
|
|
|
Post by aaron_commissioner on Feb 26, 2018 13:13:41 GMT -8
do we mean in the red for the BUDGET or the CASH? Budget. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2018 14:39:14 GMT -8
Work harder to be cash-flow, budget-conscious positive. Voted no.
|
|
|
|
Post by aaron_commissioner on Mar 3, 2018 9:48:21 GMT -8
In an effort to keep teams financially stable, we will ban trades between two teams in the red.
Changes have been made in the rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by aaron_commissioner on Mar 4, 2018 16:54:25 GMT -8
After receiving feedback, we will keep the rules "as-is." We have a good thing in the ABL and want to maintain that.
|
|
