|
Post by David - Cleveland on Sept 21, 2017 17:05:19 GMT -8
With the signing of Bryce Harper to his new deal within ABL, I made a decision on the amount offered as incentive. The existing rule, when I took over and adapted/condensed the ABL rules, was a total of $2M for all incentives offered, but given the huge money offered to Harper and the relatively small reward for some attached incentives, I altered that to $2M "PER" incentive offered. That is different and sparked some discussion in the thread I posted about it here - ablootp.proboards.com/thread/365/harper-2018-contract-tweaks-basedOne of my objectives is to keep the ABL Rules as SIMPLE as possible, for newcomers and veterans (most just glance at the rules until they run over one anyway). Some leagues have a BOOK of Rules - I avoid those leagues.
I am willing to listen to ideas about this and will propose a couple of options to get us started and see where it goes. We should decide this BEFORE the off-season, and certainly the FA season, when a bunch of contracts will be signed (some at least involving incentives).
Harper's is a huge deal and I do agree that if someone offers MAX incentives on a very small contract it can both skew things in their favour and is rather unrealistic!
|
|
|
Post by David - Cleveland on Sept 23, 2017 3:30:19 GMT -8
Clearly I didn't specify what #4 meant. IF you pick the last option, suggesting you do not agree with the options above, I would love YOU to suggest an even easier idea. Please do in a post so we can all have a look.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 16:56:50 GMT -8
Can i clarify when you mention % (10, 25) is UP to highest guaranteed contract year? The way it is worded indicates HAS to be % of selected. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by David - Cleveland on Sept 24, 2017 3:52:35 GMT -8
Can i clarify when you mention % (10, 25) is UP to highest guaranteed contract year? The way it is worded indicates HAS to be % of selected. Thanks! Yes, sorry (and I can no longer edit it I believe). The 10% and 25% options are maximums. You would have the flexibility to offer any number from ZERO to THAT PERCENTAGE for all incentives combined.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 4:48:04 GMT -8
Can i clarify when you mention % (10, 25) is UP to highest guaranteed contract year? The way it is worded indicates HAS to be % of selected. Thanks! Yes, sorry (and I can no longer edit it I believe). The 10% and 25% options are maximums. You would have the flexibility to offer any number from ZERO to THAT PERCENTAGE for all incentives combined. Thank you sir. Voted.
|
|
|
Post by David - Cleveland on Sept 26, 2017 4:12:50 GMT -8
The more I review the list of options, and in keeping with not complicating things with rules, I am liking the 10% option more and more. It scales with the value of the contract in each situation and if an easy percentage to remember against the highest year.
Still time to vote!
|
|
|
Post by aaron_commissioner on Sept 29, 2017 15:54:28 GMT -8
I've changed my vote. 10% sounds good to me.
|
|
|
Post by David - Cleveland on Sept 30, 2017 5:23:16 GMT -8
Based on the response, the rules will be changed to reflect 10% MAX for total incentives.
Like I said above, I like the 10% option because it's easy to both remember and calculate and - most of all - it scales with the value of the contract in each situation and if an easy percentage to remember against the highest year.
Thanks for your votes!
|
|